Saul Alinksy wrote in his Rules for Radicals to “Accuse your opponent of what you are doing to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt.” This is what Democrats are doing when it comes to election integrity.
Read MoreThe impeachment charge now is “incitement of insurrection.” Is it worth impeaching Trump, and is it justifiable?
Read MoreMany have asked why Musk won’t simply apologize if it was all an honest misunderstanding. And the answer to that is simple: he did nothing wrong. It is not Musk’s responsibility to correct your imagination when his enemies offend you with a blatant smear.
Trump’s victory is a major pendulum swing back toward sanity. Is he a perfect guy? No. Do I love all of his policy prescriptions? No. But Biden and the Democratic establishment have been the threat he now warns Americans about. He would have been better off delivering his address to a mirror rather than a camera.
The ideology necessary to keep abortion legal extends beyond the doctor’s office, and it’s deeper, more dangerous, and more unjust than most Americans can imagine.
Harris was not simply a person from the other side of the aisle with whom I disagreed. Her professional career is littered with detestable behavior to obtain and maintain power so that she can implement detestable and incompetent policies.
The media and many Democrats have bought the hype of Trump being a dictator, but their fictionalized worldview of Donald Trump didn’t materialize outside the borders of their delusional minds.
Since election day, I have read and heard hot takes from Democrat operatives trying to explain Vice President Harris’s loss to former (and officially future) President Donald J. Trump. So far, I’m convinced Republicans are destined to rack up more wins because Democrats do not get it.
Many Democrat operatives expect marginalized communities to experience schadenfreude when a powerful man like Trump gets what they think is coming to him. But the reality is that most people want real justice over social or performative justice.
I don’t know what her true religious convictions are, but I believe the Bible when it says you can know a tree by its fruits. She is not pro-choice. She’s pro-abortion. And there is no “separation of church and state” when the state wants to use its power to impose its wickedness onto the church and believers across the country.
“She was accused of murder after losing her pregnancy. SC woman now tells her story.” After reading this CNN headline, would you guess that Amari Marsh went through early labor—likely due to her chlamydia infection—and was charged because she didn’t remove her live child from the toilet after 911 dispatchers told her to? Probably not.
Powered by Squarespace.
Alex O’Connor was once asked by a fan why he didn’t talk about Islam and whether it was for personal or safety reasons. “Yeah, well, of course, it is a much less safe thing to do. That is a benefit of Christianity, by the way.”